Excellent analysis and suggestions. Balanced, well reasoned and with valid quotations from a great book. Kudos.

Too bad most of the comments come from radical feminists for whom there's only one truth (theirs) and only one possible stance (pro-women).

> "Until women are no longer objectified by men, sexually harassed, valued based on their physical attractiveness, fear for their safety, etc., the fight is not over."

LOL. If you substitute "women" with "people" (and "men" with "other people") in the sentence above, you clearly see there's no way that it will ever happen. Because humans are a tricky bunch and the world is never perfect. Doh!

And yet, feminism seems to pursue an ideal world were women will never suffer in any way. And this means they will NEVER be satisfied: they will always fight for something more.

> "Fighting against established social and legal systems is a winnable battle, fighting against human nature itself is not."

And yet, defying logic once again, feminism wants to mold human nature itself, e.g. through absurd ideas like "Men's sexual urge comes from culture"; in practice, denying biology and innate instincts. Since they cannot change nature, they declare nature doesn't matter while culture does (because you CAN change culture).

It's denial at its highest and most deluded (not to mention ignorant).

> "Alas, much of what passes for “feminism” nowadays is actually just flat out misandry."

Yeah. At least you have the guts to say it out loud. :-)

In her infamous book "I hate men", the feminist Pauline Harmange even affirmed that misandry cannot exist. Of course, because if something do not exist, nobody can complain about it.

> "These are the red pill men who I stand with."

Thanks for acknowledging that Red Pill is not just lunatics and weirdos. RP is also a rational view about men-women relationships.