Thanks for a detailed and insighful - if lenghty - comment.

Alas, most feminist writers cherry pick the data, but don't really understand what the data actually says - as in this author's case. Hence they build a "house of cards" thesis, based on prejudices much more than facts. They rejects all the facts not suitable to their (skewed) thesis.

As a RedPill saying goes: "Feels over reals", indeed.

Basically, this article is just man-hating feminist drivel, adding even more fuel to the war between sexes. Quite sad.